I have just remarked that the switch on the backside was still in the wrong postion ( I had checked the firmware version). The correct (and also inconstant) values are:

C:\>ping 192.168.2.115

C:\Users\Uli>ping 192.168.2.115

Ping wird ausgeführt für 192.168.2.115 mit 32 Bytes Daten:
Antwort von 192.168.2.115: Bytes=32 Zeit=27ms TTL=64
Antwort von 192.168.2.115: Bytes=32 Zeit=3ms TTL=64
Antwort von 192.168.2.115: Bytes=32 Zeit=4ms TTL=64
Antwort von 192.168.2.115: Bytes=32 Zeit=5ms TTL=64

Ping-Statistik für 192.168.2.115:
Pakete: Gesendet = 4, Empfangen = 4, Verloren = 0 (0% Verlust),
Ca. Zeitangaben in Millisek.:
Minimum = 3ms, Maximum = 27ms, Mittelwert = 9ms

C:\Users\Uli>ping 192.168.2.115

Ping wird ausgeführt für 192.168.2.115 mit 32 Bytes Daten:
Antwort von 192.168.2.115: Bytes=32 Zeit=5ms TTL=64
Antwort von 192.168.2.115: Bytes=32 Zeit=4ms TTL=64
Antwort von 192.168.2.115: Bytes=32 Zeit=3ms TTL=64
Antwort von 192.168.2.115: Bytes=32 Zeit=4ms TTL=64

Ping-Statistik für 192.168.2.115:
Pakete: Gesendet = 4, Empfangen = 4, Verloren = 0 (0% Verlust),
Ca. Zeitangaben in Millisek.:
Minimum = 3ms, Maximum = 5ms, Mittelwert = 4ms

C:\Users\Uli>ping 192.168.2.115

Ping wird ausgeführt für 192.168.2.115 mit 32 Bytes Daten:
Antwort von 192.168.2.115: Bytes=32 Zeit=3ms TTL=64
Antwort von 192.168.2.115: Bytes=32 Zeit=4ms TTL=64
Antwort von 192.168.2.115: Bytes=32 Zeit=4ms TTL=64
Antwort von 192.168.2.115: Bytes=32 Zeit=4ms TTL=64

Ping-Statistik für 192.168.2.115:
Pakete: Gesendet = 4, Empfangen = 4, Verloren = 0 (0% Verlust),
Ca. Zeitangaben in Millisek.:
Minimum = 3ms, Maximum = 4ms, Mittelwert = 3ms

Your network is roughly 50ms (that's 4.5x) slower (your remote and extender max * 2 - mine *2), so if 300/300 for the delays isn't enough then the player must be slower aswell. Could you try 300/300 and 300/350?

And if you enable the debug by adding // does it show any errors? (like the PNL error in 1.39)

Und nochmals vielen dank für den test.

The internal control logic of the 2500BT is quite slow in general, also via IR. I am sure that some other players are faster.

Currently I have 300/400 and the module as such runs well, however, I sometimes get the error-box. Is it possible to de-activate it?

The debug-panel only says "Timeout" sometimes.

You can't disable the errorbox in this version, keep increasing your delays until it's really gone. Disabling the errorbox would be a bad idea, you shouldn't get timeouts or errors at anytime. Try 350/350, 400/400 or 450/450. Remember that it's not a delay before a command is send, it's just the time between commands.

Tried to use 1.40a with my tsu9400. Getting the following error:

ProntoScript error: TypeError: .....
Offending page script: Tag: 'DE .......
Offending line #0: "if (System.o ....


note: "....." indicates what didn't fit on screen.

Any thoughts?

Control Panel has an older firmware then 7.2.22. You need the dec 2009 versions. Make sure you upgrade the extenders (1.4.5) and ProntoEdit (2.4.18) aswell.

What’s new in 1.3:
[...]
Network interface status. A new System.getNetlinkStatus class method allows retrieving
the current network interface status.

I have increased the delay times to 500 / 500 and normally get no error messages anymore.

But still sometimes, for instance when the player is reading a new BD or closing or opening the tray, I still get the error box.

It should be possible to deactivate the box!

1.41 will catch a lot of errors and solve them without you seeing a box. Probably this sunday, if my cold is any better.

1.41 changes:
Catch and solve extender busy
Try to prevent extender busy
Timing per disctype
Multiple remotes player support
IR commands (the RS232 commands that DVD players don't support)
IP player control (4010D)

1.42:
Receiver RS232 (if it works better then suspected, else 1.42 will be dropped)

1.5 :
Receiver GUI

Should one enter anything in the parameters page besides the IP address if one is connecting to the BD via IP?

Really looking forward to the Denon receiver GUI (v 1.5) - any idea when it will be available?

Thanks!

Patrick

BD IP is in 1.41 (not released yet). The address should be the IP and the port 23.
Also it's completely untested as I don't own a 4010D.


I'm aiming at this sunday for 1.41, however I got a terrible cold + fever and so do my wife and baby, so it might be delayed a week.

1.42 one week after 1.41. If there's any time left some extra receiver buttons might be in.

1.50 two weeks after 1.42. So 3-4 weeks from tomorrow. 1.50 will not include net-audio and Ipod control, this is something that might be in 2.0. It also will not have a pretty GUI, just a basic working GUI like the player in 1.1 and 1.2. Better GUI scheduled for 2.0.

Please note that I've earned exactly 0 cents with this project and all (uncountable but 200+) hours are done in my spare time. Also 1.3 and upwards are perfect for my setup and all extra time is for others. So the above schedule is an estimate and not a promise.

1.41 is postponed, maybe for a week, but I'll try do get it done earlier this week.

V1.41 send out:
Catch and solve extender busy
Try to prevent extender busy
Timing per disctype
Multiple remotes player support
Experimental IP player control (4010D)

I really hope this version will fix timing issues with BD players. It’s tested by the one with the worst timings (Tnx, Lee) and it runs great there.

Hello Hilko, I did not receive 1.41. Can you send it to me also?
Regards
Jesper

Clean your mailbox:

The mail system

<jesper.xxx@atmail.alltele.net>: cannot append message to file
    /h0/TSR/0/jesper.xxx.se/mail/mbox: error writing message: File
    too large

it's 2400 KB