Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Blu-ray & DVD Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 4 of 5
Topic:
Anyone Buy A HD DVD Player Today?
This thread has 62 replies. Displaying posts 46 through 60.
Post 46 made on Wednesday May 31, 2006 at 10:27
JimS123
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
13
On May 25, 2006 at 16:39, ceied said...
you just need to hang out with better people....
:-)

ed

Anyone with 1100 posts on a forum dedicated to remote controls isn't in the mainstream! :)

I have three HD displays myself but I live in a blue collar world where most people are perfectly happy watching their 27" Emerson televisions while listening through the single tinny speaker in it's base. Getting these people to switch to HD is going to be a lot harder than it was to get me.

Turning off the analog signal is only going to require an inexpensive digital converter to keep these sets going. All of the billions of 4:3 sets in the US aren't going to become obsolete overnight.

Without a lot of content (and lower prices), it's going to take a long, long time to get these folks to bring an HD set into their homes.
Post 47 made on Thursday June 15, 2006 at 07:30
Jervis961
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2006
22
It has been said that the porn industry decided the vhs vs beta battle by supporting vhs as the cheapest to manufacture and they will do the same with HD-DVD. I guess that sex does sell.
Post 48 made on Thursday June 15, 2006 at 16:55
barlow
Active Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
535
I have not yet seen HD set top boxes becoming ubiquitous. In fact the last time I looked at Walmart they did not even have one for sale.

I am beginning to think that the TV manuafactures are so quickly putting both a ATSC and a NTSC tuner in each 16*9 tv that they don't even need to sell ATSC STB's.

I just wish they would start putting ATSC tuners in progressive scan DVD recorders but probably that is held up by some copyright issue.

-Don B
Post 49 made on Saturday June 17, 2006 at 13:31
Anthony
Ultimate Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2001
28,872
Jervis961:

1) Porn is not what it used to be. When VHS came out it was the only way to get porn (except for nude pics) at home.

2) Your assumption that Porn will go HD DVD is wrong. Like traditional studios more porn studios expressed that they are planning on going BD
...
OP | Post 50 made on Saturday June 24, 2006 at 23:31
bookaroni
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2004
458
On June 17, 2006 at 13:31, Anthony said...
Jervis961:
2) Your assumption that Porn will go HD DVD is
wrong. Like traditional studios more porn studios
expressed that they are planning on going BD

Got a link that goes along with this theory? Or are you just hoping.
My guess is both formats will do porn equally. But that is a guess. No link to prove it one way or the other.
Post 51 made on Sunday June 25, 2006 at 21:17
Anthony
Ultimate Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2001
28,872


well can't go search for all of them, but here is the first to have announced something. It is also one of the bigger ones and one that actually already has many HD titles

[Link: avn.com]
...
OP | Post 52 made on Monday June 26, 2006 at 08:50
bookaroni
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2004
458
On June 25, 2006 at 21:17, Anthony said...
well can't go search for all of them, but here
is the first to have announced something. It is
also one of the bigger ones and one that actually
already has many HD titles

[Link: avn.com]

I did a search on Vivid's site and found nothing on which format they might choose.
What I found interesting about Digital Playground was this quote:
"the $150,000 professional-grade, high-resolution cameras Digital Playground uses impart extra "oomph" to the finished product."

I'm all about extra oomph.
Post 53 made on Monday June 26, 2006 at 22:31
Anthony
Ultimate Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2001
28,872
here [Link: macworld.com]


Steve Hirsch, head of the adult film studio Vivid Entertainment, said he’s currently using the HD-DVD format because it was the first to come out, but his studio will begin burning to the Blu-ray format as soon as it’s available.

that is the one you were looking for, right?
...
OP | Post 54 made on Tuesday June 27, 2006 at 08:43
bookaroni
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2004
458
On June 26, 2006 at 22:31, Anthony said...
here [Link: macworld.com]

that is the one you were looking for, right?

Yes, that's the one. Very interesting read.
One quote from that page:
"VHS ultimately won over Betamax because Betamax was a proprietary format owned by Sony, while VHS was more open."
My question is- Isn't Sony partially guilty of the same thing with Blu-Ray?

One thing I am positive about. I am sick and tired of this format war already. And I don't own either player yet.
Post 55 made on Tuesday June 27, 2006 at 11:43
Spiky
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2001
2,288
Beta lost because of marketing. VHS marketed itself as (1) having more storage, (2) cheaper, (3) more porn (ok, not in TV ads). And it won. None of those was truly correct, except the porn. No one factor won the war for JVC, et al. It was mainly the impression that JVC managed to get across to the public of VHS's superiority. And we well know that the public doesn't give a damn about quality, that was Beta's one point.

Today, Sony seems to have learned from that. They have managed to convince both Best Buy and Circuit City to dump HDDVD in the corner for BD. Even though Sony, Pioneer, Panasonic will not have players out for 3-4 more months. And their encoder is faulty. And they can't make a dual layer disc to save their lives. It's very impressive marketing so far that people still think BD is superior.
Post 56 made on Tuesday June 27, 2006 at 21:03
Anthony
Ultimate Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2001
28,872
My question is- Isn't Sony partially guilty of the same thing with Blu-Ray?

no, if anything it is the opposite



HD DVD players - only Toshiba and an RCA labelled Toshiba
BD players - no Sony so far, just Samsung, and there are several other manufacturers (Philips, Panasonic, Pioneer, LG.....)

One thing I am positive about. I am sick and tired of this format war already. And I don't own either player yet.

agree with that 100%
...
Post 57 made on Thursday June 29, 2006 at 18:46
ceied
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2002
5,753
think i might pony up for a bluray on monday.... gotta see 5th element in hd

ed
Ed will be known as the Tiger Woods of the integration business, followed closely with the renaming of his company to "Hotties A/V". The tag line will be "We like big racks and tight holes"...
Post 58 made on Friday June 30, 2006 at 07:18
Spiky
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2001
2,288
If reports are accurate, you might just want to put a Superbit copy in and upconvert it to HD. The BD disc seems to be from a very poor master, and then run through Sony's POS encoder that clips black level.
Post 59 made on Friday June 30, 2006 at 13:26
barlow
Active Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
535
Beta vs VHS - as I recall the VHS technology was more available for manufactures to build units around, while the Beta although of supior quality particulary in the audio dept. did not make the format as available to other manufactures.

As I recall there were a lot more VHS machins available at affordable prices than Beta machines.

And than of course once the rental stores cut back on the Beta movies........

-DonB
Post 60 made on Tuesday July 4, 2006 at 07:31
JimS123
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
13
On June 30, 2006 at 07:18, Spiky said...
If reports are accurate, you might just want to
put a Superbit copy in and upconvert it to HD.
The BD disc seems to be from a very poor master,
and then run through Sony's POS encoder that clips
black level.

As i understand it, the Sony encoder isn't clipping video black, it's clipping below black. It's a non-issue as far as picture quality is concerned. It's not optimum, but it's not a fault either...it's just a bad way of setting the levels.

Now, Fifth Element is unfortunately a real issue. They either used a very poor master, or they just plain blew it. The movie only looks marginally better than the Superbit, with a lot more garbage evident.

Of the first weeks releases, Underworld Evolution looks pretty good, Terminator is acceptable and everything else is pretty bad to awful. I actually believe Hitch is worse than the SD DVD.

The second week seems a bit stronger. Ultraviolet is what Fifth Element should have been. It's beautiful in every respect. Just a not so interesting story. I watched Crash last night, and it looked very nice. Some people are having stuttering issues on the Lionsgate titles, but I didn't on that particular one. Lord of War is this evenings movie....so I hope for the best.

If HD DVD hadn't come out and set the bar so high, I doubt anyone would be complaining so vocally about Blu Ray. This is the real world though, and from a picture quality standpoint HD DVD is blowing Blu Ray away. Considering it'shardware is half the price of Blu Ray, Sony and their cronies have really blundered.

I got a tremendous deal on my Samsung, and even with that deal, I was close to returning it. I can't honestly recommend anyone pick one up yet. If you want HD movies today, HD DVD is the clear choice. I still believe Blu Ray will be the ultimate winner of the format war, but it's not ready for public consumption at this point.
Find in this thread:
Page 4 of 5


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse