Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Philips Pronto Professional Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 1 of 2
Topic:
iPad vs Pronto Pro
This thread has 15 replies. Displaying all posts.
Post 1 made on Tuesday November 9, 2010 at 00:34
Barry Gordon
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2001
2,157
I just finished converting my Pronto Pro theater control app to an iPad. I used the iRule application which was adequate for the task. Bear in mind that I only communicate with the PC that controls all aspects of the theater over TCP so I had no issues iPad wise with IR or RS232 or missing device codes etc.

I am not planning to abandon my Pronto Pro's. Members of my family asked me if I could build A/V control systems for their iPads, hence my interest

It took me about 10 days from start to finish. Most of the effort was spent getting a reasonable set of graphics and then dealing with the iRule application which is in a very early state of development. Since the iRule/iPad combination does not allow two way communications I had to eliminate one capability in my theater but not a big deal. The iRule learning curve was not too step, and the forum and customer support operations were very good. Not as good as RC (Here) but their formal customer support was excellent even on weekends. Remember they are a new forum we are an old established one. The iRule product is aimed at hobbyists at DIY'ers as much as installers and the formally recognize the DIY base.

The following comments pertain more to the iPad and really have nothing to do with iRule. iRule is analagous to PEP at about a development level of PEP 1

I really missed the hard keys!!! With the Pronto I had the hard keys doing very common things and could always locate them by feel. With the iPad I always had to look at the screen and that was a pain.

The iPad is very bright and it is always on. The screen does not have (AFAIK) a blanking feature with a user controlled timeout. It was very distracting. I ended laying it face down on the couch next to me.

Which brings up the next issue. When I picked it up the iPad always tried to adjust orientation. I only implemented landscape pages so it would show blank pages for the portrait modes. It would be nice if one could tell the iPad not to be so fancy. I did not implement gestures but the sliding gesture was there. Will be implementing the portrait pages but need to redesign the graphics slightly.
Post 2 made on Tuesday November 9, 2010 at 01:53
wall-e
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2008
55
Jailbraik your iPad, do some home work

- won't get a auto lock any more
- always on is possible.

In a few weeks there come's an app that enables the motion sensor to wake up the screen! (that problem solved ;) )

I agree totally on the hard buttons, but i'm swiping now on the iPad to change menu/channels, wich is working pretty good. .
Post 3 made on Tuesday November 9, 2010 at 06:13
nyjklein
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2002
108
Hi Barry,

The switch on the right hand side is an orientation lock.

I've been testing iRule as well and I agree the lack of hard buttons and the current inability to dim or blank the screen are the two major annoyances.

Jeff
Post 4 made on Tuesday November 9, 2010 at 06:26
RobboNL
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2006
13
Crestron has a hard button add-on for the iPad:

[Link: hardwaresphere.com]
Post 5 made on Tuesday November 9, 2010 at 06:51
iam-940
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2002
91
Don't have an ipad, but would be interesting to see a video of this in action.
Post 6 made on Tuesday November 9, 2010 at 08:33
lscolman2
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2003
216
I've had a play with iRule, and thinks it does just enough to allow you to control the very basic stuff.

I definately think there is a market for an iPad surround with hard buttons, similar to the Crestron solution.

The problem may be when Apple introduce the new range of iPad without physical docking ports. What would this surround interface to?

Interesting times...

I'd love to see some screenshots of your iRule panels Barry.

Cheers, Lee
Post 7 made on Tuesday November 9, 2010 at 13:50
Niclas Widell
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2008
19
Hi Barry.
One question why did you choose to use Irula instead of Command Fusion?
I'm thinking of moving on to ipad and wonder how you thought.
Command Fusion 2-way wireless communication, or?
What cand of receiver do you use to your ipad.
Global Cache or someone else?

Sincerely,
Niclas
OP | Post 8 made on Tuesday November 9, 2010 at 18:11
Barry Gordon
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2001
2,157
I was contacted by the iRule people and asked if I would assist them/advise them. I never looked at command fusion since I did not know about it. I do intend to look at it. My real goal is to eventually code on the iPad natively, i.e. using the Cocoa framework. My experience with the iPad so far is much less satisfying than with the Pronto form a usage standpoint.

My theater is controlled by a PC. My home automation system is PC based TCP and UDP are the only modes of communications (Transport layer) I use. I have a Global Cache GC118 as part of the house infrastructure to handle all IR except in the theater where a USB-UIRT handles it.
OP | Post 9 made on Tuesday November 9, 2010 at 18:44
Barry Gordon
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2001
2,157
Iscolman2, I just posted a zip archive with the screen snapshots from the iPad. It is on my web site. They are very similar in layout to what is on the Pronto Pro with addition of more soft keys (buttons) for such thing as cursor and volume control. My profile has my website address

Last edited by Barry Gordon on November 10, 2010 11:56.
Post 10 made on Wednesday November 10, 2010 at 01:48
BluPhenix
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2008
371
On November 9, 2010 at 18:11, Barry Gordon said...
My experience with the iPad so far is much less satisfying than with the Pronto form a usage standpoint.

Well Barry the pronto was made for with the home control application in mind.
Post 11 made on Wednesday November 10, 2010 at 02:57
Niclas Widell
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2008
19
About the ipad.
How does it work as a remote control, given that one is not made for it?
How often do you recharge it?
What do you think about it so far?
Post 12 made on Wednesday November 10, 2010 at 10:42
buzz
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2003
4,379
Currently I am not using iRule, but I must give them credit for good support. I sent them an email on a Saturday afternoon and within the hour he had tracked me down through the company website and called me.

They seem aggressive and willing to listen.

I have mixed feelings about developing my programs through a Google cloud.
Post 13 made on Wednesday November 10, 2010 at 23:28
brodricj
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2008
116
I am using both TSU9600 and iPad to control my theater. The Pronto does everything I could possibly wish for, and then some more. It's brilliant. The iPad is very savvy as well, it normally lives on a wall dock and also, quite often, I find the iPad and Pronto sitting next to each other on the couch. They are both rock-solid on wifi, no issues at all (I have them tuned into different WAP's).

Pronto is my preferred device because of it's size and the tactile response of hard buttons. I can't assimilate with the iPad screen observations of Barry, I've never found myself needing to turn it upside down due to screen brightness. Actually I think my iPad screen times out to sleep, and lights up when I pick it up. I rarely use the screen lock but I do understand things can go haywire with screen orientation until you get used to it.

My Pronto and iPad basically show the same information. I have DVD and CD coverarts display on the panels (2-way feedback), I can scroll/sort through the media collection and choose what I want to play using touchscreen on iPad, or the scroll wheel on the Pronto. I can also search for content, by Artist name etc, using both the Pronto and iPad via touch keypad. Transport controls via iPad work with double tap on the coverart, or using the dedicated transport control icons. When I use the Pronto to scroll through coverarts the function is replicated on the iPad, and vice versa. It's really cool to be using my Pronto to control playback of content and see the iPad mounted on the wall mimicking everything the Pronto is doing!

2-way feedback on both iPad and Pronto extends to the normal things you'd expect, like time elapsed, time remaining, track titles, chapter number etc etc. I don't have volume level feedback display on either the Pronto or iPad, although if I knew prontoscript I could make this work on the Pronto.

With iPad I can grab the TV guide off the net, and set my PVR to record any program I want, up to 2 weeks in advance (I can't do that with Pronto...I'm sure it can be done I just don't know how). I can't directly control the PVR as such, I can only tell it what to record based on choosing programs via the on-line TV guide.

Volume control is slightly tricky on the iPad, but only because of my unconventional application (I'm still working on it, it involves interfacing iPad with CBUS and then have CBUS issue the vol+, mute, vol- commands). If I went conventional using a GC IP2IR gateway then volume control in my theater would be straightforward. I'm only using CBUS in this way so I can also control my theater using my CBUS touchscreen. Otherwise I'd stick with the GC gateway.

Anyway, that's theater control in my house. The kids love it, both the iPad and the Pronto. I'd say the iPad wins out with them because they also play games and do other stuff on it that Pronto isn't intended for. Pronto/iPad are probably the only 2 things my wife has never complained about, so that is testament to the fact that they work, and are useful.

Last edited by brodricj on November 11, 2010 01:37.
Post 14 made on Thursday November 11, 2010 at 05:33
Gonkius
Lurking Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2009
9
brodricj: Can you share with us what applications you run on the Pronto and iPad and what media player you use?
Post 15 made on Thursday November 11, 2010 at 07:07
brodricj
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2008
116
The software (module) on Pronto is by Kaleidescape, via IP control and it's free. Source switching and volume control etc etc via RS232/RFX9600, by me using basic Level 1/2 skills in PEP2. The app on iPad is by Remotescape, $90 from memory. IP control (obviously), volume control also possible via IP or RS232 using suitable gateway hardware. Both platforms simulate each other very closely. So simple and intuitive that my 3 year (now 4) old can operate the system entirely on his own, and he taught himself how to do it (and he taught me a few things as well!). The other app on iPad for TV guide and setting PVR record timers is by Foxtel, and it's free. The apps and Pronto module only work on the platforms for which they were designed (i.e. Kaleidescape and Foxtel).

They are both very powerful control systems and they work together in complete harmony with no issues what-so-ever. It just demonstrates what the Pronto and iPad are capable of when very clever people put their mind to writing the software to make it work.
Page 1 of 2


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse