On September 7, 2006 at 15:07, sunstar said...
An excellent summarization by Cincy Dave but I would like
to make one clarification. According to a CSR at URC
each AD can determine which software is made available
to the end consumer. They may supply either the version
with or without the live-update function.
I wish whoever said that hadn't. It just needlessly causes concern where there should be none. There's no reason to supply the non-updateable version to a customer IMO. Even when I'm doing a local job, I either supply the updateable version or none at all. The customer either needs to be able to change the programming themselves or they don't and that can be done with either version.
