I have a 2000 and a 3000. At first I was disappointed by the 3000 screen, it's just not as sharp as I had hoped. However, comparing the two side by side with the same bitmap setup, the 3000 is much more cleaner and clearer. The whole specs about 16 scales of grey really don't mean much since the lighter shades barely show up.

I'm suspecting that my 2000 isn't so great because I have noticed the brightness/contrast has slowly been degrading. The 3000 contrast is quite nice. But the blue light is different from the green light.

I think you'll be happy with it. But it's not enough to say WOW. I still don't understand why they can't get a screen like the Sony Clies or HP Ipaqs on there.