| Post 1 made on Wednesday April 17, 2002 at 16:25 |
arron Founding Member |
Joined:
Posts: | December 2001
2 |
|
|
Time to get a new CD player, DVD Audio player in a few years when I need a new player
|
|
| Post 2 made on Thursday April 18, 2002 at 05:23 |
djy RC Moderator |
Joined:
Posts: | August 2001
34,761 |
|
|
I have a Sony SCD-XB770 SACD player. What would you like to know?
|
|
| Post 3 made on Monday April 22, 2002 at 20:48 |
robr45@aol.com Founding Member |
Joined:
Posts: | April 2002
12 |
|
|
A few of the high end magazines like stereophile say that the biggest advantage to these players is running the multiple dacs in parallel while in 2 channel mode. There was an article that featured the opinions on multichannel music from 4-5 high end retailers in NYC. It was an interesting article. The consensus was that 2 channel would remain the high end playback preferance while multichannel would mainly be adventageous for low to mid/upper level and video. Other articles have pointed towards running all the dacs for 2 channel operation. Great results apparently.
-rob
|
|
| Post 4 made on Saturday April 27, 2002 at 04:56 |
Spillage Founding Member |
Joined:
Posts: | January 2002
85 |
|
|
It won't be long before 'Blue-Ray' becomes standard and, in my opinion, both SACD and DVD-A will be no more. Both these formats use compression in one form or another except I think DVD-A when using MLP (Meridian Lossless Packaging) Blue-Ray can store 25Gb per layer. Therefore one normal looking disc will be able to store 100Gb. Who the f%$k needs compression then. My advice By a cheapy if you machine is bust, or wait..........................
|
|
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our
Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product
click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
