Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Blu-ray & DVD Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 1 of 2
Topic:
Denon DVD's
This thread has 17 replies. Displaying posts 1 through 15.
Post 1 made on Sunday September 21, 2003 at 17:00
Scooper
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
March 2002
319
Anyone had any experience with Denon DVD3800 vs. Denon new DVD2900? picture & sound quality diference between the two?? compared to diferent brands?

Scoop
Post 2 made on Monday September 22, 2003 at 10:48
Spiky
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2001
2,288
I haven't compared the 2, but the 2900 is excellent. The addition of SACD outweighs the advantages of the 3800, which are few. Check out [Link: hometheaterhifi.com] for the best progressive scan technical reviews on the planet.
Post 3 made on Monday September 22, 2003 at 14:52
djy
RC Moderator
Joined:
Posts:
August 2001
34,763
Yep, even I've decided to take the plunge with the 2900.
Post 4 made on Tuesday September 23, 2003 at 10:37
Spiky
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2001
2,288
A seemingly unimportant feature that is currently unique on the 2900 and is just plain awesome, four words:

No Layer Change Pause!
Post 5 made on Thursday October 9, 2003 at 18:32
JSap
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2003
16
But before you put down $995 for the DVD2900 you might want to check out the new DVD2200 for $599. I haven't demoed it yet but everything I have read says that it has almost everything the 2900 has but at a lower price.

It's DVD-A & SACD and uses the the same chip as the 2900. Only dif. is maybe a smaller power supply.
Post 6 made on Thursday October 9, 2003 at 22:53
Joe Gildein
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2003
118
I have the 2800 mkII, and am very satisfied.
Post 7 made on Friday October 10, 2003 at 11:51
Spiky
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2001
2,288
Smaller power supply, different DACs, different video chips, also.

Not necessarily worse on the video, but the audio can't keep up. Probably a very good buy.
Post 8 made on Saturday October 11, 2003 at 19:22
JSap
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2003
16
You are right. The power supply, DACs but I thought that the video chip was the same. I haven't read anything about the actual sound quality being different. Only the potential because os the first two items. And then there is that price (almost twice as much).

PS I have a new Denon DVD-1600 and I am going to move up to the 2200 or 2900 but realize that both will be obsolute when the higher resolution players (ie blue light) are released. I realize that it will be a couple of years.
Post 9 made on Monday October 13, 2003 at 09:50
Spiky
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2001
2,288
I thought I saw that it had similar video to the 1600. Which isn't worse or better overall than the 2900, just different, they are both excellent. I could be wrong.

In the audio world, you end up paying a very high premium for each increase in DAC performance. Everybody has to decide for themselves at what point it is no longer worth it.
Post 10 made on Tuesday October 14, 2003 at 14:09
djy
RC Moderator
Joined:
Posts:
August 2001
34,763
What to do?

My 2900 duly arrived, connected it, started the setup, then disaster strikes. The RGB output from the SCART is all screwed up. Did numerous checks between it and my 2800II and there's no doubt, it's kaput.

Sent it back to the supplier, who confirmed the fault. They have, in turn, sent it back to Hayden (Denon UK), where it languishes awaiting tests.

Do I, bearing in mind new 2900's are as rare as hens teeth,

i). Wait for a new one?
ii). Accept it as a repaired unit?
iii). Go for an alternative (bearing in mind that if I wanted an alternative I wouldn't have bought the 2900)?
iv). Get a refund (which doesn't help me play the SACD's and DVD-A's I've recently purchased).

Not exactly a nightmare scenario as I, fortunately, retained the 2800II. It’s pretty close though.
Post 11 made on Wednesday October 15, 2003 at 11:02
Spiky
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2001
2,288
I'd say this machine is worth some effort. Can you find one elsewhere in the EU?

I wish I was in the UK, I'd get region-free firmware more easily. I haven't dared try it on my USA model, yet. Too many reports of problems using European firmware.
Post 12 made on Thursday October 16, 2003 at 14:31
JSap
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2003
16
Actually, its nothing like the 1600 (I have one) but just like the 2900. Both 2200 & 2900 use the Silicon Image/DVDO PureProgressive (SiI504) Decoding Engine while the 1600 uses the Faroudja (still very good). The 1600 is DVD-A wuhile the other two are SACD & DVD-A. The 2200 & 2900 have a 12 bit/108 MHz, Video D/A Conversion system while the 1600 has a 10/54MHz bit system.

My dilemma is do I change from a new 1600 to the 2200 or just wait 2 years for the new HD DVD.
Post 13 made on Friday October 17, 2003 at 04:10
djy
RC Moderator
Joined:
Posts:
August 2001
34,763
JSap,

As you seem to be the font of all wisdom re. the video heart of all dvd players, can you tell me what they used in the 2800II? The chaps at AV-land were wondering if the multi region software they used on my 2900 could have screwed up the RGB output.

Personally, having bought the 2800II from them (and not had a peep out of it) I think it's a little far fetched. You never know though.

Oh, and does anyone know anything about the Pioneer 868AVi?
Post 14 made on Friday October 17, 2003 at 09:07
JSap
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2003
16

The 2800II uses Silicon Image/DVDO SiI504 Engine w/ 108 MHz 12 bit Video D/A Conversion. There is a complete site dedicated to the 2800II but can't remember the URL now.

Don't know anything about region free upgrades but this site is dedicated to that:
http://www.dvdupgrades.ch/
Thought about a region free /copy free XBox.
Post 15 made on Friday October 17, 2003 at 09:55
Spiky
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2001
2,288
Thanks for the clarification. I was thinking of the new 5900, which has the upgrade of the Faroudja chip.

There are differences in the video between the 2200, 2900, 2800, 3800, even though they all use the SiI chip. And apparently they've now altered the 2200 to correct for the bass deficiency for SACD and DVD-A playback.

2200 should be a very good machine.
Page 1 of 2


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse