Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Home Entertainment News Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Topic:
The Truth About “High-End” Cables?
This thread has 1 response. Displaying all posts.
Post 1 made on Tuesday April 15, 2008 at 07:45
cmckenney
Electronic House Magazine
Joined:
Posts:
September 2007
230

The Truth About “High-End” Cables?

Although marketed as a performance enhancer, many view high-end cables as the snake oil of consumer electronics.

So you’ve just spent a bundle on a new HDTV or a home theater system. You’re about to head for the register, and the salesperson suggests that since you’ve invested so much in your system, it needs expensive cables to give you optimal performance.

If visions of rust-proofing and high-end floor mats come to mind, you may be on the right track. Ever since Monster Cable started operations decades ago, the myth that “more expensive cables are better” has been heavily promoted to the A/V consumer. It’s true that we should all avoid poorly-made cables, but whether there’s anything out there that will give you better performance than, for example, Radio Shack’s “gold” cables, has yet to be proved. Years ago, Stereo Review magazine (now Sound and Vision) did a true double-blind study of premium cables. A few of their testers discerned a very slight difference between cables, but no improvement was detected.



But that’s all old history, we’re told, because those cables were “analog.” With new “digital” cables (e.g., HDMI), quality is more important than ever. Indeed, the term “digital” sounds more complicated and less familiar, so we’re inclined to accept what we’re told. Still, knowledge is power, so let’s examine the facts.

In actuality, all signals are analog in nature. So all signals need a reasonably good wire to travel un-degraded from point A to point B. True analog signals travel as a continuously changing voltage, which must be faithfully reproduced on the far end of the cable. Equipment can tolerate a small amount of degradation, but significant disruptions will be reproduced, uncorrected, in your speakers.

For more, check out
[Link: electronichouse.com]
Post 2 made on Tuesday April 15, 2008 at 12:07
OTAHD
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2005
4,679
On April 15, 2008 at 07:45, cmckenney said...
But that’s all old history, we’re told, because those
cables were “analog.” With new “digital” cables (e.g.,
HDMI), quality is more important than ever. Indeed, the
term “digital” sounds more complicated and less familiar,
so we’re inclined to accept what we’re told. Still, knowledge
is power, so let’s examine the facts.

No. You've got it wrong. Analog signals are the ones that are affected by cable quality. Digital is only highs and lows, ons and offs, ones and zeros, trues and falses, whatever you want to call it...so cable quality is not the issue with digital.

In actuality, all signals are analog in nature.

You could say that, but that depends on how you define analog compared to digital. I'd say they're not.

Now, you start contradicting yourself.

As long as the digital signal isn’t degraded so much that the 0/1 measurement is made in error, the receiver will receive the transmitted signal with no imperfections. Even better, most signals include extra data bits used to check and reconstruct the transmitted data, so that even if an occasional 0/1 is received incorrectly, it can usually be fixed, again resulting in a perfect signal.

Very true.

A higher quality cable may increase the difference between the high and low voltages, but anything better than “good enough” does not provide an improvement. An acceptable 0 or 1 (upper trace) and an exemplary 0 or 1 (lower trace) convey the exact same information.

Again, true.

So how do you know if your cable is good enough? Analog signals degrade gracefully. A slightly-damaged analog signal can sound very similar to a good one, such that only trained ears might hear a difference. However, with a digital signal, the effect of even a few uncorrected 0s and 1s is likely to create obvious distortion of picture or sound. Thus, if your HDMI signal sounds and looks good, it is most likely just fine.

True.

Gold-plated connectors resist oxidation and rust, and can be found even on mid-priced cables. But if you connect a gold cable to a non-gold connector (like on the back of your receiver), oxidation can still occur on the non-gold surface. Unplugging and re-plugging your cables once a year can help keep them clean.

True, but irrelevant, unless you're keeping your equipment outside on the beach.

Bottom line: If a digital cable can correctly convey 1s and 0s, further improvements have no benefit. For analog signals, regular cables have only a negligible effect on the quality of the signal, so even though an exotic cable may reduce that effect, it’s unlikely that the difference would be audible.

Pretty much true. I'm not saying that a factory-equipped RCA cable will be as good as a custom made one, but for the most part, it's not noticable.

I don't exactly get what you're saying. The article is correct, but your synopsis post seems to contradict it.
LET'S GO BUFFALO!!!

Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse