On November 5, 2009 at 18:10, Jimmy Bellagio said...
This is my single most problem with URC. They can't seem to ever innovate across the products. The MX-5000 is perfectly capable of browser. If everyone and their mother can use an iphone app, why is the MX-5000 not big enough for broswer. It's always followed by "people won't use it anyway". What market research supports that? And why would you develop it for the 6000 if it were going to be a "useless" feature?
So aren't they allowed to market what they want, how they want, at whatever price they want? Isn't that considered free market?
That is what makes RTI much better than URC. RTI would never come out with a $1800 and a $1200 remote, then develop something for the higher priced remote without at least trying to implement it for the %1200 one. It just makes no sense.
So don't ever consider URC ever again, and move on to the RTI forum.
|So all the CI's who sold their customer an MX-5000 over the 6000 citing it does the same things because the customer likes the handheld has to tell them that URC feels they would not want to use a browswer on the remote. |
There was never a "Same as" pitch. Browser was always disclaimed.
|It's absolutely crazy. This message is not directed at anyone who works at URC and is posting here. I am simply stating that the 5000 deserves these upgrades. It's insane. |
Call them, buy a private label deal as others do, and tweak to your hearts content!
