Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Complete Control by URC Forum - View Post
Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Original thread:
Post 22 made on Sunday January 7, 2007 at 12:59
Ernie Bornn-Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
On January 7, 2007 at 05:57, Alec said...
As I have line of sight I am now thinking of getting one
of those IR receivers that send IR signals to multiple
IR devices via the standard cables pasted to the front
of the AV equipment

I would definitely go with IR if you can use it. If you're an installer, I would wonder why you went with the added expense and difficulty of RF if you had line of sight.

The one place where RF is the go-to solution is where your display mucks up the IR receiver. Plasmas almost always do, and LCDs do sometimes.


Simpler technology usually means less capability but less difficulty. For instance, although we have wireless access points for computers, we're just nuts if we don't run CAT5 wherever we can. Copper is more reliable (and faster) than wireless. IR is more reliable (and sometimes faster, for instance with Prontos) than RF.
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw


Hosting Services by ipHouse