| Post 12 made on Friday February 17, 2006 at 10:05 |
johnsfine IR Expert |
Joined:
Posts: | September 2002
5,159 |
|
|
The "stuv" you are quoting was just a placeholder I typed into some description in some other thread of how to construct "900A" format proto hex.
There is no generally accepted meaning for "stuv" in discussion of Pronto Hex.
But, the value 18E7 or 1818 that Lydel described as CCSS does correctly fit the position where I had "stuv" in that description in that other thread.
| |
|
|
