On February 20, 2007 at 21:56, james hampton said...
Just amazing how many issuses there are with these remote.Not
really mocking it but the threads are so huge for issues
with these remotes.Just a thought.
Because at the time, what we saw was an activity-based remote with lots of hard buttons, an enormous programmability potential, lower cost than an MX-950 and software that had room for improvement.
What we didn't see was a company that enjoys flipping its customers the finger on a regular basis.
It's not the remote that is the problem, it's the company that now manages it.
