Mr. Funk,

>I have absolutely NO buyers remorse on either
>remote!

Considering you could have had two of whichever
one you prefer, instead of one of each, one could
infer from your professed total lack of buyer's
remorse that you have no preference. Since you
have previously expressed a preference for the
15-1994, I see this as an inconsistency. Please
explain.

>Call UEI, and ask them about #5 & #6! You may
be surprised at the answer given!!!

UEI's employees have supplied me with nothing but
erroneous information thus far. Ergo, I consider
their opinion irrelevant, and their data highly
suspect, and not to be trusted. (For instance, if
one were to believe them, one would think it
impossible to learn functions to keys other than
the "L" keys.)

>I prefer knowledge based on actual usage!

I see no harm in augmenting such experience with
a more objective form of testing.

>As for the solar cell method, I base my results
using a Photoradiometer!

1. There is no such word as "photoradiometer."

2. Assuming you meant "radiometer", I have one,
and it is wholly inappropriate for this form of
testing.

3. Assuming you mean photgraphic light meter, or
"photometer", the use of a solar cell attached to
a meter is not only as good, but is in fact how
you build a photometer. Haven't you ever
wondered how it is that a standard photometer
does not require batteries? It is because it
contains a solar cell.

-=Ingenious=-