Anthony, When we start using journals to verify a word in Scrabble then I will accept your original combo. According to WEBSTER's Unabridged (a.k.a. really,really big) Dictionary of the English lanquage, Supercalifragelistic is not listed.
Supercalifragelistic expialidocious is.
I rest my case.
so basically you are disallowing many scientific words just because you don't know them and can't find them in the dic? Don't forget that any book is written in time and a the job of a dic is to give words that are or were common. For any word that is in there there countless words that are not. Also if Websters does have the entry the way you posted it "Supercalifragelistic expialidocious" then by definition those are two words and not one, and "Supercalifragelistic expialidocious" is an idiom (expression) like bull sh!t made up of two words.
on the other hand, if it is because you think there is some honour in this game
You could become famous just like me
then it is trivial to put two words together this way
like blissful hemeroid that I am sure no one has put together.
The real game Googlewhacking is to enter two words in the google search that bring up one and only one result
