Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
HDTV Reception Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Topic:
Best Antenna suggestions?
This thread has 4 replies. Displaying all posts.
Post 1 made on Thursday December 2, 1999 at 21:42
Kenny West
Historic Forum Post
For those of you with HDTV's and decoders, any suggestions on good (preferrably small) antennas? Looking at the TV60 by Terk.. Any help is appreciated!
OP | Post 2 made on Thursday December 2, 1999 at 22:28
wayne
Historic Forum Post
Winguard makes a really good directional UHF antennae that has a good forward gain with little back side pick-up.HD signals have the same problems as analog frequences because they are actually on an analog carrier.
OP | Post 3 made on Thursday December 2, 1999 at 22:30
wayne
Historic Forum Post
by the way for th best reception on terresteral braodcasts, the best signal strenght is about -15DB, unlike conventional broadcasts that usually come in about +15DB
OP | Post 4 made on Friday December 3, 1999 at 10:42
Kenny West
Historic Forum Post
Anyone have a URL for the Winguard site? Could not locate one...
OP | Post 5 made on Tuesday December 21, 1999 at 12:03
DanKurts
Historic Forum Post
Kenny:
I realize this is an old post and you might have solved the problem, but there might be others in the same boat.
This is the Winegard site.
http://www.winegard.com/
The antennas I use for most of my HDTV installs is either the Radio Shack model Cat.#: 15-2162 , costs about $40, or the smaller brother for about $30 Cat.#: 930-0193. These work well when you're close in (approx 0-10 miles, depending on terrain, transmitter power, etc), where directionality is more important and signals are splattering off everything. In the woods, out to about 30-50 miles, + or -, I use this "bedspring" for distance #3021
[Link: starkelectronic.com]
made by Channel Master, costs about $30. I don't use the Winegard simply because my supplier doesn't carry it, but if it looks similar, would be fine. Also found the long amplified Terk to be marginal at best. The key I've found in many installs is it's not the signal level that's the problem, but signal to noise ratio. I've had Mitsubishi sets, notoriously finicky, work with signals below the -44db threshold of my meter on a super "clean" signal, would've bet the farm they wouldn't, blew me away ! The same set with a "dirty" signal would barely work at +10 and quit again at +15. But with the antenna mis-aimed about 20 degrees, so it only saw a few splattered signals, it worked fine at any setting from -20 to +20. Digital decoders only have so much buffer space for junk signals, and have to weed through to find one clear one. If there's a lot of signal level from another UHF station, then usually some harmonic will be strong enough to cause the decoder grief. If you can mis-aim the antenna enough to attenuate the hot station, and still pick up some of the HDTV station, you're on. Without a signal strength meter, it's tough to sort out. You can fake it if you know who the other stations are and where the transmitters are. You can also amplify the signal, if too far away, but be sure to trap out the VHF stuff before the amp or you'll just increase the noise and problems.
There's a lot more, but you get the idea. It's VERY different from receiving analog TV signals. Be glad to help if you need more info. Shoot me a note with questions.


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse