Next question: When Bill Clinton was impeached, were the proceedings against him completely justified?
Um, history tells us that they weren't justified. He was acquitted, remember?
And here you go again with the false equivalencies. It appears that Trump has committed High Crimes and Misdemeanors. Clinton got a BJ and lied about so Hillary wouldn't go all Lorena Bobbitt on him.
Fins: Still Slamming' His Trunk on pilgrim's Small Weenie - One Trunk at a Time!
In the Climate Change "Debate" you accuse me of not answering the questions, or providing my "side" of the argument. I've told you repeatedly that the issue has been debated to death and I'm not going to waste any time on it.
But on this thread, when you make a statement, or ask a question. When anyone comments or answers you we get nothing back except ^^^^ your cute Emojis.
How about some substance in your answers?
Here's a question: What do you think of Trump, today, seeking help from China to interfere with the 2020 elections? Who need transcripts? Who needs whistleblowers? This idiot goes right in front of the cameras and admits to criminal behavior!
Fins: Still Slamming' His Trunk on pilgrim's Small Weenie - One Trunk at a Time!
On October 3, 2019 at 20:57, davidcasemore said...
Ha-Ha.
How about some substance in your answers?
On October 2, 2019 at 02:57, djy said...
Oh, I can discuss science up and down and back again. And yet you never have.
But, like I've mentioned more than once on this thread, this topic has been discussed to death. Clearly it hasn't, for if it had you wouldn't need be here to tell us so.
It's revealing that you can't seem to understand that this issue has been debated to death and that there is one, and only one, clear way to interpret the data. Clearly there isn't only just one way to interpret the data, for it that were the case the issue would resolved itself long before now by the polar ice caps having disappeared, sea-level rise inundating costal regions etc.
Any thing else is like arguing about a flat Earth. Then why keep returning here repeating your baseless claims, when by doing reveals yourself to have no understanding of the science, no understanding of the data and, most tellingly, no argument?
…we're all gonna die. The most accurate thing you've ever said, but I think we can safely assume it's not the sole preserve of climate change.
We used to call that the pot calling the kettle black. With your command of cute-isms, you probably have an even better phrase for it.
There is no truth anymore. Only assertions. The internet world has no interest in truth, only vindication for preconceived assumptions.
On October 1, 2019 at 17:09, Mac Burks (39) said...
Trump told a guy that his aid package might not show up unless he goes after a political opponent.
.
This is what the Democrats and the Media have opined, and you've bought into it.
Personally, I think he was holding up "aid" being given to a VERY corrupt country, and ASKING said countries leader to reopen the investigation into the corruption with Burisma and the massive corruption that just happened to involve Hunter Biden.
If you read up on this, you should have some questions about why H. Biden was involved.
Notice, none of the conversation asked to dig up dirt on Joe Biden, who is far from being a real threat to the Trump 2020 campaign.
Why does no liberal have a problem with J. Biden holding up millions until the investigation involving Burisma was stopped and the proecutor fired?
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
