Keep out of this thread? You funny boy.

There was certainly enough evidence to impeach Clinton, and more of our legislators thought he was guilty than not guilty. It just didn’t happen to reach the threshold to put him on trial. But to call him acquitted is another classic case of rewriting history, as though he was not guilty when he was. Why would you do that? Why are facts not important to you, unless they happen to serve your point of view?

There are many things that we can agree upon, when they are factual. Many things you may say about Trump I would be in complete agreement with. But when you can’t do anything with certain facts except adjust it to your viewpoint, how can we have a discussion?

In the interest of your far reaching survey, I don’t think impeaching him would do any good. It would not help the country. It would not go far enough to remove him from office. It would probably put a large dent in the Democrats chances for unseating him in the next election.