On September 4, 2019 at 23:23, tomciara said...
I can’t see anything but you, describing yourself.
I think djy and I are willing to look at all angles to see what we can agree with.
You will never get to the bottom of the real challenges to the hypothesis (I purposely said that) unless you read opposing views. Then you can see there are two sides to every discussion.
When any opposing view is immediately blown off as “propaganda”, you make it clear that honest dialogue is beyond your simple willingness to engage.
You can’t read a mainstream site and get anything but affirmation for the prevailing view. That is no help. Try the Science of Doom as djy mentions, so you can see that there is actually some science that does not agree. You will become more knowledgeable in the process.
Sometimes there aren't two sides. Sometimes there aren't opposing views.
Two plus two is four. There is no reason to argue otherwise. I am not going to waste my time trying to convince people of something that they should already realize is so. It's why I never argue about the existence of god. For one, you can't prove a negative, and second, I'm not going to change anybody's mind. And that's fine. I just don't really give a crap what people want to believe. Like the hurricane headed to Alabama (chalk that up to one more doozy that no other president would have uttered, much less try to defend with a Sharpie-altered map!)
Am I a climate scientist? Hell no. But I trust climate scientists. I'm not a doctor either, but I trust doctors. That's why I didn't have my accountant remove my gallbladder.
